Article 45 GDPR - Transfers on the basis of an adequacy decision
Relevant Recitals
- Recital 103 Appropriate Level of Data Protection Based on an Adequacy Decision
- Recital 104 Criteria for an Adequacy Decision
- Recital 105 Consideration of International Agreements for an Adequacy Decision
- Recital 106 Monitoring and Periodic Review of the Level of Data Protection
- Recital 107 Amendment, Revocation and Suspension of Adequacy Decisions
Frequently Asked Questions
Short answers to common questions about this provision. They are general information and not legal advice.
Under Article 45(1), where the Commission has decided that a third country, a territory or one or more specified sectors within that country, or an international organisation ensures an adequate level of protection, transfers may take place without any specific authorisation. The adequacy decision thus removes the need for the appropriate safeguards of Article 46 or the derogations of Article 49 for the transfers it covers.
Paragraph 2 directs the Commission to take account in particular of the rule of law, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, relevant legislation including on public security, defence, national security, criminal law and public authority access to personal data, data protection rules, rules on onward transfers, case-law, and effective and enforceable data subject rights with administrative and judicial redress. It must also consider the existence and effective functioning of one or more independent supervisory authorities with adequate enforcement powers, and the international commitments and other legally binding obligations of the country or organisation.
No. Under paragraph 3 the implementing act must provide for a periodic review at least every four years, and under paragraph 4 the Commission monitors relevant developments on an ongoing basis. Where information reveals that adequacy is no longer ensured, paragraph 5 requires the Commission, to the extent necessary, to repeal, amend or suspend the decision by implementing acts without retroactive effect, and paragraph 6 obliges it to enter into consultations with the country or organisation to remedy the situation.
Yes. Paragraphs 1 and 3 expressly contemplate decisions covering a territory or one or more specified sectors within a third country, and the implementing act must specify its territorial and sectoral application. Adequacy can therefore be confined, for instance, to a defined category of recipients or a particular sector rather than the whole jurisdiction.
A decision under paragraph 5 is without prejudice to transfers made pursuant to Articles 46 to 49, as paragraph 7 makes clear, so exporters may fall back on appropriate safeguards or the derogations. Paragraph 8 requires the Commission to publish in the Official Journal and on its website the list of countries, territories, sectors and organisations for which adequacy is or is no longer ensured, and paragraph 9 keeps decisions adopted under Article 25(6) of Directive 95/46/EC in force until amended, replaced or repealed.