Article 17 GDPR - Right to erasure (‘right to be forgotten’)
Frequently Asked Questions
Short answers to common questions about this provision. They are general information and not legal advice.
Paragraph 1 obliges the controller to erase without undue delay where one of six grounds applies, namely that the data are no longer necessary for the purposes of collection, that consent under point (a) of Article 6(1) or point (a) of Article 9(2) has been withdrawn and no other legal ground exists, that an objection under Article 21(1) is not outweighed by overriding legitimate grounds or an objection under Article 21(2) has been made, that the data have been unlawfully processed, that erasure is required by a Union or Member State legal obligation, or that the data were collected in relation to information society services offered to a child under Article 8(1). Outside these grounds, the data subject has no claim to erasure under this Article.
No. Paragraph 3 disapplies paragraphs 1 and 2 to the extent that processing is necessary for freedom of expression and information, for compliance with a legal obligation or a task in the public interest or official authority, for public health reasons under points (h) and (i) of Article 9(2) and Article 9(3), for archiving, research or statistical purposes under Article 89(1) where erasure would render the objectives impossible or seriously impair them, or for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims.
Under paragraph 2 it must take reasonable steps, including technical measures, to inform other controllers processing the data that the data subject has requested erasure of any links to, or copies or replications of, those data. The obligation is calibrated to available technology and the cost of implementation, so it is one of reasonable effort rather than a guarantee that every copy disappears.
Only where consent was the basis of the processing and no other legal ground exists, as point (b) of paragraph 1 makes clear. If the controller can lawfully continue the processing on a different ground of Article 6(1), such as a legal obligation, withdrawal of consent alone does not oblige it to erase.
Point (c) of paragraph 1 links the two rights. An objection on grounds of the data subject's particular situation under Article 21(1) leads to erasure only if the controller cannot demonstrate overriding legitimate grounds, whereas an objection to direct marketing under Article 21(2) triggers erasure without any balancing, since Article 21(3) prohibits further processing for that purpose outright.