Article 49 GDPR - Derogations for specific situations
Relevant Recitals
- Recital 111 Exceptions for Certain Cases of International Transfers
- Recital 112 Data Transfers due to Important Reasons of Public Interest
- Recital 113 Transfers Qualified as Not Repetitive and that Only Concern a Limited Number of Data Subjects
- Recital 114 Safeguarding of Enforceability of Rights and Obligations in the Absence of an Adequacy Decision
- Recital 115 Rules in Third Countries Contrary to the Regulation
Frequently Asked Questions
Short answers to common questions about this provision. They are general information and not legal advice.
Only in the absence of an adequacy decision under Article 45(3) and of appropriate safeguards under Article 46, including binding corporate rules. The derogations are therefore a third tier, not an alternative that a controller may choose freely, and each of them is tied to a specific situation listed in the first subparagraph of Article 49(1).
The data subject must explicitly consent to the proposed transfer after having been informed of the possible risks that the transfer entails for them precisely because there is no adequacy decision and no appropriate safeguards. This informational element goes beyond the general consent conditions of Articles 4(11) and 7, and consent remains withdrawable under Article 7(3), which makes the ground unstable for ongoing flows.
The second subparagraph of Article 49(1) permits this only as a last resort, where neither Articles 45 or 46 nor any listed derogation applies. The transfer must not be repetitive, must concern only a limited number of data subjects and must be necessary for compelling legitimate interests not overridden by the interests or rights and freedoms of the data subject, and the controller must assess all the circumstances and provide suitable safeguards on that basis. The controller must also inform the supervisory authority of the transfer, inform the data subject of the transfer and of the interests pursued beyond the information required by Articles 13 and 14, and document the assessment and safeguards in the records referred to in Article 30, as paragraph 6 requires.
No. Paragraph 3 excludes points (a), (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 1, and the compelling-legitimate-interests clause of the second subparagraph, for activities carried out by public authorities in the exercise of their public powers. A public authority may still invoke, for instance, important reasons of public interest under point (d), but paragraph 4 requires that public interest to be recognised in Union law or in the law of the Member State to which the controller is subject.
Paragraph 2 prohibits transferring the entirety of the personal data, or entire categories of the data, contained in the register. Where the register is open only to persons with a legitimate interest, the transfer may take place only at the request of those persons or where they are to be the recipients, and point (g) itself requires that the conditions laid down by Union or Member State law for consultation be fulfilled in the particular case.